Skip navigation.

Fall 2006

10 Reasons to Rethink ‘Overpopulation’

By the Population and Development Program at Hampshire College

Fears of overpopulation are pervasive in American society. From an early age we are taught that the world is overpopulated and that population pressure is responsible for poverty, hunger, environmental degradation and even political insecurity. If we don’t get population growth under control now, the argument goes, our future is in danger.

References

  1. The population ‘explosion’ is over.

    For a review of population dynamics, see Mary Lugton with Phoebe McKinney, Population in Perspective: A Curriculum Resource, Amherst, MA: Population and Development Program, Hampshire College, 2004, http://www.populationinperspective.org, and United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, “World Population Prospects, the 2004 Revision,” February 24, 2005.

  2. The focus on population masks the complex causes of poverty and inequality.

    Population in Perspective, Section Four, “Population and Poverty,” and Betsy Hartmann, Reproductive Rights and Wrongs: The Global Politics of Population Control, Boston: South End Press, 1995.
  3. Hunger is not the result of ‘too many mouths’ to feed.

    Population in Perspective, Section Two, “Population, Food and Hunger.” and Frances Moore Lapp�, Joseph Collins and Peter Rossett, World Hunger: Twelve Myths, New York: Grove Press, 1998.
  4. Population growth is not the driving force behind environmental degradation.

    Population in Perspective, Section Three, “Population and the Environment.” On military and environment, see Joni Seager, “Patriarchal Vandalism: Militaries and the Environment,” in Jael Silliman and Ynestra King, eds., Dangerous Intersections: Feminist Perspectives on Population, Environment and Development, Boston: South End Press, 1999, 163-188. On the positive role many poor people play in protecting the environment, see James K. Boyce and Barry G. Shelley, eds., Natural Assets: Democratizing Environmental Ownership, Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 2003. On gender and biodiversity, see Patricia L. Howard, ed., Women and Plants: Gender Relations in Biodiversity Management and Conservation, London: Zed Books, 2003.
  5. Population pressure is not a root cause of political insecurity and conflict.

    Betsy Hartmann and Anne Hendrixson, “Pernicious Peasants and Angry Young Men: The Strategic Demography of Threats,” in Betsy Hartmann, Banu Subramaniam and Charles Zerner, eds., Making Threats: Biofears and Environmental Anxieties, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2005, 217-237. For more on the youth bulge, see Anne Hendrixson, “Angry Young Men, Veiled Young Women: Constructing a New Population Threat,” Corner House, Briefing No. 34, December 2004, http://www.thecornerhouse.org.uk.
  6. Population control targets women’s fertility and restricts reproductive rights.

    See Reproductive Rights and Wrongs; Amy Oliver and Diana Dukhanova, “Depo-Provera: Old Concerns, New Risks,” DifferenTakes, No. 32, Population and Development Program, Hampshire College, Spring 2005, http://popdev.hampshire.edu/projects/dt; Rajani Bhatia, “Ten Years after Cairo: The Resurgence of Coercive Population Control in India,” DifferenTakes, No. 31, Spring 2005, http://popdev.hampshire.edu/projects/dt; and Kay Johnson, Wanting a Daughter: Needing a Son, Minneapolis: Yeong and Yeong, 2004.
  7. Population control programs have a negative effect on basic health care.

    Sarah Sexton, Sumati Nair and Preeti Kirbat, “A Decade after Cairo: Women’s Health in a Free Market Economy,” Corner House, Briefing No. 30, June 2004, http://thecornerhouse.org.uk; John Cleland and Steven Sinding, “What would Malthus say about AIDS in Africa?” The Lancet, Vol. 366, Issue 9500, Pages 1899-1901 (November 26, 2005); UNAIDS: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, http://www.unaids.org/en/Regions_Countries/Regions/SubSaharanAfrica.asp.
  8. Population alarmism encourages apocalyptic thinking that legitimizes human rights abuses.

    John Dryzek, “Looming Tragedy: Survivalism,” in The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997, 23-44; Susan Greenhalgh, “Science, Modernity and the Making of China’s One-Child Policy,” Population and Development Review, Vol. 29, No. 2 (June 2003), 163-196; Larry Lohmann, “Malthusianism and the Terror of Scarcity,” in Hartmann et al, eds., Making Threats, 81-98.
  9. Threatening images of overpopulation reinforce racial and ethnic stereotypes and scapegoat immigrants and other vulnerable communities.

    Elynor Lord, “The Huntington Challenge: Why “The Hispanic Challenge” Should be Discredited,” DifferenTakes, Fall 2004, http://popdev.hampshire.edu/projects/dt; Adam Werbach, “Hostile Takeover: Anti-Immigration Coalition Seeks Control of Sierra Club,” In These Times, March 9, 2004; Binta Jeffers, “Population Control Imagery: Stopping the Blame,” computer graphic presentation, Committee on Women, Population and the Environment, forthcoming 2006; Jael Silliman and Anannya Bhattacharjee, eds., Policing the National Body: Race, Gender and Criminalization, Cambridge. MA: South End Press, 2002; Dorothy Roberts, Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction and the Meaning of Liberty, New York: Pantheon Books, 1997; Elizabeth L. Krause, “Dangerous Demographies: The Scientific Manufactureof Fear,” Corner House, Briefing No. 36, July 2006, www.thecornerhouse.org.uk.
  10. Conventional views of overpopulation stand in the way of greater global understanding and solidarity.

    See Jael Silliman, Marlene Gerber Fried, Loretta Ross and Elena R. Guti�rrez, Undivided Rights: Women of Color Organize for Reproductive Justice, Boston: South End Press, 2004; Adam Werbach, “End of the Population Movement, The American Prospect, October 5, 2005; and “Call for a New Approach” in Silliman and King, eds., Dangerous Intersections, xx-xxi.
Tags:

The Testosterone Threat: Sociobiology, National Security and Population Control

By Betsy Hartmann

Continuing son preference and the widespread practice of sex-selective abortion of female fetuses in India and China are leading to ever more skewed sex ratios in those populations. India’s 2001 census, for example, revealed a shocking decline in child sex ratios in many areas of the country. Overall, there are 927 girls for every thousand boys, but in a number of northern states the figure is much lower. In Delhi, in the first six months of 2005, only 716 girls were born for every 1000 boys.1

Betsy Hartmann, director of the Population and Development Program at Hampshire College, is a longstanding activist in the international women’s health movement. She is the author of Reproductive Rights and Wrongs: The Global Politics of Population Control and a political thriller about the Far Right, The Truth about Fire. She is co-editor with Banu Subramaniam and Charles Zerner of Making Threats: Biofears and Environmental Anxieties

References

  1. Mohan Rao, “Sex Selective Abortions in India: How Population Policies Make Things Worse,” presented at the conference, “Sex Selection: Technologies, Population and Social Relations,” organized by the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, Centre for Women's Development Studies and Action, New Delhi, India, January 23-24, 2006.
  2. Valerie M. Hudson and Andrea M. den Boer, Bare Branches: The Security Implications of Asia’s Surplus Male Population, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.
  3. Anne Hendrixson, “Angry Young Men, Veiled Young Women: Constructing a New Population Threat,” The Corner House, December 2004, http://www.thecornernhouse.org.uk
    .
  4. Report of the meeting, “Young Men and War: Could we have predicted the distribution of violent conflicts at the end of the millennium?” Woodrow Wilson Center, Environmental Change and Security Project Report, No. 7, 2001, 230-231.
  5. “Why is France Burning?” November 6, 2005, http://direland.typepad.com.
  6. “Russia ‘Thinning Out’ Chechens,” BBC News, July 23, 2002, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/world/europe/2146702.stm (accessed October 2002).
  7. See Kay Ann Johnson, Wanting a Daughter, Needing a Son: Abandonment, Adoption and Orphanage Care in China, St. Paul, Minnesota: Yeong and Yeong, 2004.
  8. See Rajani Bhatia, “Ten Years after Cairo: The Resurgence of Coercive Population Control in India,” DifferenTakes No. 31, Spring 2005, http://popdev.hampshire.edu/projects/dt/dt31.php and SAMA Resource Group for Women and Health, Beyond Numbers: Implications of the Two-Child Norm, New Delhi: SAMA, 2005.
  9. Mohan Rao, “Sex Selective Abortions in India: How Population Policies Make Things Worse,” 2005.
Tags:

Too Many Grannies? The Politics of Population Aging

By Sarah Sexton

Until recently, pensions were primarily of interest to just two minorities: older people and actuaries. But no longer. As The Economist puts it, “for the first time, pensions are as hot as an issue can get.”1 Pensions are now prompting workers to put up the barricades and go on strike across Europe. They are triggering bankruptcies among topranking companies. They are filling newspaper pages and television screens.

Sarah Sexton is at The Corner House, a research and solidarity group based in the United Kingdom that aims to support democratic and community movements for environmental and social justice. This piece is drawn from a recent Corner House Briefing by Richard Minns with Sarah Sexton entitled, “Too Many Grannies: Private Pensions, Corporate Welfare and Growing Insecurity.” http://www.thecornerhouse.org.uk.

References

  1. “Britain’s Pensions Pickle,” The Economist (leader), (December 3, 2005), 11.
  2. Dean Baker and Mark Weisbrot, Social Security: The Phony Crisis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1999), 31.
  3. Trevor Matthews, “Fewer pension pots, more efficiency,” Financial Times (November 23, 2005), 19.
  4. Gordon L. Clark and Noel Whiteside, Pension Security in the 21st Century: Redrawing the Public-Private Debate (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003).
  5. Kofi Annan, “Migrants can help rejuvenate an ageing Europe,” Financial Times (January 29, 2004).
  6. Gary Younge, “Detox this racist culture,” The Guardian (May 16, 2005).
  7. “The global workforce: How to realise the benefits of migration, and reduce its risks,” Financial Times (editorial) (October 6, 2005), 18.
  8. Tito Boeri, Herbert Brucker and Richard Portes, “It’s economic sense to open borders,” Financial Times (June 10, 2005), 19.
  9. United Nations, World Population Ageing: 1950-2050, Department of Economic and Social Affairs: Population Division (New York, 2002), http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/worldageing19502050/.
  10. Paul Krugman, “America’s Senior Moment,” The New York Review of Books (March 10, 2005), 6-11.
Tags:

Colonizing the Future:“Scarcity” as Political Strategy

By The Corner House

The past is consumed in the present and the present lives only to bring forth the future.
James Joyce1

Tomorrow belongs . . . Tomorrow belongs . . . Tomorrow belongs to me!
Chorus, Nazi drinking song, Cabaret2

A preoccupation with the future not only prevents us from seeing the present as it is but often prompts us to rearrange the past.

Eric Hoffer3

The Corner House is a research and solidarity group based in the United Kingdom that aims to support democratic and community movements for environmental and social justice. This piece evolved from a collaborative project with the Women’s Global Network for Reproductive Rights to analyze the continuing power of Malthusian thinking. http://www.thecornerhouse.org.uk.

References

  1. J. Joyce, A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, 1916.
  2. Cabaret, film directed by Bob Fosse, script by Christopher Isherwood and John VanDruten (1972).
  3. Eric Hoffer, The Passionate State of Mind (New York: Harper and Row, 1954).
  4. Eugenio Díaz and Sherman Robinson, “Biotechnology, Trade and Hunger,” Biotechnology and Genetic Resource Policies, Brief 2, IFPRI, (Jan 2003), http://www.ifpri.org/pubs/rag/br1001/biotechbr2.pdf.
  5. Testimony of David Sandalow, Assistant Secretary of State for Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs, to the Subcommittee on International Economic Policy, Export and Trade Promotion of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Washington, DC, (July 12, 2000), http://bogota.usembassy.gov/wwwse507.shtml.
  6. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, Genetically Modified Crops: The Ethical and Social Issues, (1999), paras 4.8, 4.10, http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/go/ourwork/gmcrops/publication_301.html.
  7. Larry Lohmann (ed), Carbon Trading: A Critical Conversation on Climate Change, Privatisation and Power, Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation, the Durban Group for Climate Justice, and The Corner House, (2006).
  8. World Commission on Water for the 21st Century, A Water Secure World: Vision for Water, Life and the Environment, (2000), 15.
  9. Ibid, 35.
  10. UNDP, Beyond Scarcity: Power, Poverty and the Global Water Crisis, Human Development Report 2006, available at http://hdr.undp.org/hdr2006/.
  11. Herman Kahn, quoted in VaTech Hydro, Annual Report 2001, 33, http://www.vatech.a.
  12. George Santayana, The Life of Reason (Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books, 1998).
Tags:
Syndicate content